A high-achieving grammar college is going through a authorized problem over whether or not pupils could be stopped from progressing into the ultimate A-level yr.
Mother and father of pupils from St Olave’s, within the London borough of Bromley, say that eradicating pupils between Yr 12 and 13 – the decrease and higher sixth – is a type of exclusion.
Legal professionals representing the mother and father declare that such an exclusion is illegal and are searching for a judicial evaluation.
The varsity has not commented up to now.
St Olave’s is one in every of England’s top-performing grammar colleges, with locations selected educational means.
However mother and father are contesting whether or not pupils who’ve been admitted to the decrease sixth ought to have the ability to be stopped from persevering with into the higher sixth and taking their A-levels.
Their legal professionals are searching for a judicial evaluation, with the appliance to be heard on 20 September, in a dispute first highlighted by the Guardian.
The mother and father declare that stopping pupils from persevering with into the higher sixth yr is in impact an exclusion – and it’s illegal for a college to exclude a pupil on the grounds of an absence of educational progress.
Dan Rosenberg, the lawyer representing the mother and father, mentioned: “We hope the governing physique will now rethink the coverage and its utility, and additional that the kids affected can return to their A-level research initially of time period with their friends.”
Any change on account of the problem may have far-reaching penalties, as a result of many colleges put situations on pupils carrying on into the ultimate yr.
From the varsity’s perspective, this is able to not be seen as an exclusion, however a call on whether or not to confess a pupil for entry into the higher sixth and A-levels.
Head academics say that that is about skilled judgement – and that they want to have the ability to resolve whether or not pupils are appropriate for a qualification.
However there have additionally been claims that eradicating weaker college students on the finish of decrease sixth is a approach for colleges to guard their standing in league tables.
The authorized problem going through St Olave’s would restrict the varsity’s proper to hold out such choice between the 2 years of sixth type.
It argues that educational choice can be utilized when pupils enter the varsity, however not for development between years.
The authorized problem claims that pupils have been anticipated to realize a grade B or above in three out of 4 AS-levels.
This yr’s A-level outcomes at St Olave’s noticed 75% of all grades being awarded at A* or A and 96% have been at A* to B grades, far above the nationwide common.