A high-achieving grammar college is going through a authorized problem over whether or not pupils will be stopped from progressing into the ultimate A-level 12 months.
Dad and mom of pupils from St Olave’s, within the London borough of Bromley, say that eradicating pupils between 12 months 12 and 13 – the decrease and higher sixth – is a type of exclusion.
Attorneys representing the dad and mom declare that such an exclusion is illegal and are in search of a judicial assessment.
The college has not commented up to now.
St Olave’s is one among England’s top-performing grammar colleges, with locations selected tutorial potential.
However dad and mom are contesting whether or not pupils who’ve been admitted to the decrease sixth ought to be capable to be stopped from persevering with into the higher sixth and taking their A-levels.
Their legal professionals are in search of a judicial assessment, with the appliance to be heard on 20 September, in a dispute first highlighted by the Guardian.
The dad and mom declare that stopping pupils from persevering with into the higher sixth 12 months is in impact an exclusion – and it’s illegal for a college to exclude a pupil on the grounds of an absence of educational progress.
Dan Rosenberg, the lawyer representing the dad and mom, mentioned: “We hope the governing physique will now rethink the coverage and its software, and additional that the youngsters affected can return to their A-level research at the beginning of time period with their friends.”
Any change because of the problem might have far-reaching penalties, as a result of many colleges put situations on pupils carrying on into the ultimate 12 months.
From the varsity’s perspective, this may not be seen as an exclusion, however a choice on whether or not to confess a pupil for entry into the higher sixth and A-levels.
Head lecturers say that that is about skilled judgement – and that they want to have the ability to resolve whether or not pupils are appropriate for a qualification.
However there have additionally been claims that eradicating weaker college students on the finish of decrease sixth is a manner for colleges to guard their standing in league tables.
The authorized problem going through St Olave’s would restrict the varsity’s proper to hold out such choice between the 2 years of sixth kind.
It argues that tutorial choice can be utilized when pupils enter the varsity, however not for development between years.
The authorized problem claims that pupils had been anticipated to realize a grade B or above in three out of 4 AS-levels.
This 12 months’s A-level outcomes at St Olave’s noticed 75% of all grades being awarded at A* or A and 96% had been at A* to B grades, far above the nationwide common.