A high-achieving grammar faculty is dealing with a authorized problem over whether or not pupils might be stopped from progressing into the ultimate A-level 12 months.
Mother and father of pupils from St Olave’s, within the London borough of Bromley, say that eradicating pupils between Yr 12 and 13 – the decrease and higher sixth – is a type of exclusion.
Legal professionals representing the mother and father declare that such an exclusion is illegal and are looking for a judicial evaluate.
The varsity has not commented up to now.
St Olave’s is one in all England’s top-performing grammar faculties, with locations selected educational means.
However mother and father are contesting whether or not pupils who’ve been admitted to the decrease sixth ought to have the ability to be stopped from persevering with into the higher sixth and taking their A-levels.
Their attorneys are looking for a judicial evaluate, with the applying to be heard on 20 September, in a dispute first highlighted by the Guardian.
The mother and father declare that stopping pupils from persevering with into the higher sixth 12 months is in impact an exclusion – and it’s illegal for a college to exclude a pupil on the grounds of an absence of educational progress.
Dan Rosenberg, the lawyer representing the mother and father, mentioned: “We hope the governing physique will now rethink the coverage and its utility, and additional that the youngsters affected can return to their A-level research in the beginning of time period with their friends.”
Any change on account of the problem may have far-reaching penalties, as a result of many colleges put situations on pupils carrying on into the ultimate 12 months.
From the varsity’s perspective, this could not be seen as an exclusion, however a choice on whether or not to confess a pupil for entry into the higher sixth and A-levels.
Head lecturers say that that is about skilled judgement – and that they want to have the ability to determine whether or not pupils are appropriate for a qualification.
However there have additionally been claims that eradicating weaker college students on the finish of decrease sixth is a method for faculties to guard their standing in league tables.
The authorized problem dealing with St Olave’s would restrict the varsity’s proper to hold out such choice between the 2 years of sixth kind.
It argues that educational choice can be utilized when pupils enter the varsity, however not for development between years.
The authorized problem claims that pupils have been anticipated to attain a grade B or above in three out of 4 AS-levels.
This 12 months’s A-level outcomes at St Olave’s noticed 75% of all grades being awarded at A* or A and 96% have been at A* to B grades, far above the nationwide common.