The pinnacle of Ofsted says she has had threats from “a mix of Islamic extremists and the onerous left” after elevating considerations about religion faculties.
Amanda Spielman mentioned she obtained some “fairly venomous stuff” after a report criticising some non secular faculties.
Speaking to the Times, she mentioned one message threatened “we are able to get you any time we need to”.
Further safety has been drafted into an Ofsted regional workplace after inspectors had been despatched excessive Islamic literature.
The pinnacle of the colleges inspectorate not too long ago revealed her annual report, which warned a rising variety of conservative non secular faculties had been undermining equality legal guidelines.
A e-book found in one of many criticised faculties was referred to as Girls Who Should go to Hell.
She claims among the practices in non secular faculties had been sexist and sectarian.
Within the Occasions, she mentioned: “I am not simply bruised. I do not fall over once I see a load of nasty tweets pointed at me.
“However there was some fairly venomous stuff.
“I had an e mail, which was essentially the most threatening one, which was alongside the strains of ‘we all know the place you reside and we are able to get you any time we need to'”, she added.
Ms Spielman’s Ofsted report mentioned that there have been considerations that the multiculturalism of non secular faculties typically got here “into stress with the expectation that college students must be ready for all times in trendy Britain”.
The report claimed faculties had been intentionally selecting to not meet requirements attributable to tensions between a faculty’s authorized necessities for equality, and the expectations of conservative non secular communities.
She added: “If we let ourselves be intimidated out of discussing these points, it is kids who will endure.”
A Division for Training spokeswoman mentioned: “It’s completely proper that Ofsted reviews on faculties that fail to guard kids or fail in some other solution to meet the requirements we count on, in order that we are able to take motion to make sure they adhere to the legislation.”